Every officer of government swears an oath to support the Constitution; in the case of state officials they swear to uphold the Constitution of their state as well as the Constitution for the united States of America. My article, "A Plan of Action", seeks to remove those who have violated their oath (liars) and replaces them with people who are honorable (honest). This removes the corruption from office and restores the Constitution in one motion from the local to the Federal, strengthening the people and reinvigorating our republic with every success. The successors of those removed would have the actions of the people placing them there as a direct notice showing what will happen should they entertain the notion of betraying their duty.
After the corrupted officers are replaced, I call for returning the constitutions to their pre-civil war status in order to remove the effects of the corporate system we're under today. All amendments, treaties, statutes, and official actions either state or Federal in contravention of the constitutions as of January 1, 1860, will be null and void. It is a plan returning the republic to liberty and a total restoration of the Bill of Rights to its true character. In my article, "Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Dilemma of Law Enforcement in the Age of Globalism," I state the following:
"In a Constitutional Republic, the Constitution is the people's permission for government. If the legislature doesn't have the power granted in the Constitution it doesn't have the power, period. Cops that have been brainwashed to enforce everything the legislature passes have become little more than bureaucratic drones, taught that their conscience matters little in the face of the law. This is the very reason I focus my attention on the oath of office because the primary object of that oath is support for the Constitution. Only laws passed in pursuance of the Constitution and in conformity with the powers granted by it are enforceable, not just anything the legislature can dream up or the majority of their constituents clamor for; we are not a democracy. If the police and sheriffs didn't enforce usurpation and thus becoming armed thugs of criminal legislators, then the people wouldn't be against them. Putting the power of what is just and lawful up to the legislature and the courts is a recipe for disaster that has existed for centuries, which is precisely why the Convention created a Constitutional Republican form of government, using the principle of Federalism to create a Union of sovereign states that would check excesses of power from each other. The oath of office binds all officers to the terms of the Constitution, not whatever opinion to the contrary they can dream up.
Due to fraud and the imposition of amendments on the Constitution through duress after the conquest of the states in the Civil War, vital separations of power have been removed and all power today is focused on the Executive Branch of the Federal Government… certainly not on the Constitution and rights of the people. No matter how you frame this issue, cops are caught between usurpation and the people; up to now they have been squarely in the camp of the usurpers. Enforcing usurpation turns the people against police even if they had nothing to do with creating the usurpation; they are still enforcing it and that is what the people are forced to react to."
This principle is further reinforced here:
16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256:
The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.
Slavery would not be re-instituted as many leftists/progressives would claim; we have come too far as Americans to consider such nonsense and the language permitting it should be among the first things removed by amendment. Remember, at this stage of the game the Islamists would be removed from our offices of honor and trust, so the risk of slavery would be gone. Furthermore, unlike the period before the Civil War, the whole of the people are armed... at least those that have chosen to be, so the age of physical chains and whips is over. My plan seeks to remove the virtual chains from our people and replace the chains that have been removed from our Constitution.
ALL offices of honor and trust in the republic must undergo this transformation and the effects of fraud and corporatism removed in order for righteousness to be restored to our land. After restoring our republic it would be prudent to remove traitors from academia, industry, and every place of leadership they may be found. If they're not loyal to the American Republic they should not be allowed to threaten us by weakening us through globalist agreements with our enemies or those countries wishing to weaken our economy in favor of theirs. The age of profit over honor and loyalty must come to an end if we're to be free. If our system of government brings us prosperity and success the world should emulate it, not be allowed to destroy it through the greed of the elite.
"The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime and the punishment of his guilt." -- John Philpot Curran
Link to related articles: